What We Believe In

There's a shift in health care, one that skipped the debate stage entirely. No methodology discussion, no ethical framework, no comparison study. People just started doing it.

People are researching symptoms and conditions. Consuming ongoing research to design their own protocols. Buying their own compounds. Making their own decisions about what goes into their bodies. They’re not waiting for permission, because the system that’s supposed to grant it has become too slow, too expensive, and too disconnected from what people actually need.

This is sovereign health. And we believe it’s one of the most important shifts of our time.

We didn’t start Finnrick because we have an opinion about whether you should take peptides. We started Finnrick because people already are, and reliable, independent information about what’s actually in the vial has been too hard to get.

We believe in your right to choose. You should be able to make informed decisions about your own body, your own health, and your own risk tolerance. That’s not a fringe idea. That’s a foundational one.

We believe informed consent requires measurement. If you’re going to inject something, you deserve to know what’s in it. Not what the label says. Not what a vendor claims. What’s actually, measurably, verifiably in the vial. We’ve tested over 7,000 peptide samples. Roughly one in three fail basic expectations.

We believe transparency is a force. When we publish test results, things change. Vendors improve their processes. Communities compare notes. Standards get sharper. We’ve watched this happen in real time, because published measurements create accountability.

We believe in influence, not control. Finnrick will never have veto power over what you buy or what anyone sells. We don’t want it. Centralized gatekeeping models are failing the very people they were designed to protect. We believe a different model is possible: one based on transparency, reputation, and the collective intelligence of people who care about doing this carefully.

We believe the market can correct itself, if it has the right tools. That’s what Finnrick provides: independent testing, public data, and standards explicit enough to be argued with. The data stays constant and public. The criteria stay explicit. And the interpretation of “would I accept this” can be personal.

We believe in the people who send us their vials. Every sample we receive represents someone who cared enough about safety to act. They sacrificed a product they paid for, sometimes hundreds of dollars worth, because they wanted to know the truth, and they wanted to share it. That trust is the foundation of everything we do, and we will never take it for granted.

We believe vendors will (eventually) do the right thing. Building a sound supply chain is hard work, and some will stumble on the way. Finnrick data is there for those who want to improve.

We believe this is just the beginning. Peptides are our starting point, not our destination. The principles that make Finnrick work, transparency, accountability, community-driven standards, apply far beyond any single category. Wherever people are making health decisions outside traditional channels, there’s a role for what we’re building.

We’re a small team with an office in Austin, Texas, with a simple conviction: people making sovereign health choices can use a bit of help from transparent data and collective scrutiny.

That’s what we believe in. And we’re just getting started.

Raphaël Mazoyer

CEO, Finnrick Analytics

‍