Huaian Dinglin Trading
Finnrick has tested 6 samples from Huaian Dinglin Trading across 1 product.
Take Action
Request Full Data Access to the Finnrick database of peptide tests.
Products
| Tests | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | Rating | Count | Avg | Min | Max | Oldest | Most Recent | |
| Retatrutide | 6 | 6 Mar 2026 | 2 May 2026 | |||||
The Huaian Dinglin Trading samples tested by Finnrick were either acquired by Finnrick directly, or submitted by the public.
Customer Reviews
These indicators of customer satisfaction are based on reports submitted by the public through the Finnrick testing program, and are not verified.
Based on 10 overall satisfaction reports
People who submitted test requests to Finnrick gave Huaian Dinglin Trading an average satisfaction rating of 3.6 out of 5 across 10 reports associated with samples received and tested by Finnrick. Customers rated ease of purchase (4.2/5), payment methods (4.5/5), and customer service (4.2/5) particularly highly. Meanwhile, delivery speed (3.1/5) received comparatively lower ratings.
Most recent Huaian Dinglin Trading tests
Samples are tested in commercial labs
tests
products
Scores
First
Last
| Quantity | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Date | Product | Certificate | Test Score | Label | Tested | Difference | Purity | Batch ID | Container | Tested At | Sent By |
| 2 May 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 30mg | 34.8mg | +16.0% | 99.80% | (no batch ID) | White Label / Silver Crimp / Violet Cap | Lab G | Public | |
| 15 Apr 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 15mg | 14.7mg | -2.0% | 99.80% | (no batch ID) | No Label / Black Crimp / Clear Cap | Lab G | Public | |
| 19 Mar 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 10mg | 9.71mg | -2.9% | 99.90% | (no batch ID) | No Label / Copper Crimp / Clear Cap | Lab E | Public | |
| 18 Mar 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 20mg | 20.5mg | +2.5% | 99.90% | (no batch ID) | No Label / Gold Crimp / Clear Cap | Lab E | Public | |
| 6 Mar 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 10mg | 4.39mg | -56.1% | 99.90% | (no batch ID) | No Label / Silver Crimp / Clear Pink Cap | Lab E | Public | |
| 6 Mar 2026 | Retatrutide | View | 5mg | 4.25mg | -15.0% | 99.90% | January 10, 2026 | Silver Label / Silver Crimp / Clear Pink Cap | Lab E | Public | |
About Huaian Dinglin Trading Test Results From Finnrick
Huaian Dinglin Trading is a peptide vendor with multiple products tracked in the independent testing dataset collected by Finnrick. This page compiles recent, batch-level test results across 1 product and 6 tests, including scores, test dates, batch IDs, and lab details. This enables you to compare quality over time, not just marketing claims.
Each tested sample receives a 0–10 score, with 10 being the best possible value. It is the total of three components: purity (0–4 points), quantity accuracy vs. the label or batch claim (0–4 points), and batch information quality (0–2 points).
When several test results are available for a product and vendor pair, you’ll also find a Finnrick Rating (A–E, where A is best and E is worst, X if an insufficient number of tests is available, or F in rare cases of documented and widespread fraud) and customer satisfaction reports with sub-scores that provide additional context. Use the table above to review purity, quantity accuracy, consistency between batches, and any notable outliers surfaced in Finnrick testing data.
Huaian Dinglin Trading Testing Activity & Score Summary
In the past 30 days, Finnrick has published no new test results for Huaian Dinglin Trading, and 4 in the past three months. The overall dataset includes 6 tested samples with an average score of 6.9/10 across all products.
Across 6 identity-tested samples, 100% were confirmed to contain the expected peptide (identity pass rate). Among those that passed, median purity was 99.9%. Approximately 100% of passing samples tested at or above 98% purity.
Here is a closer look at the most frequently tested products:
- Retatrutide (6 tests, 100% identity pass, median purity 99.9%) — Test scores are highly variable, ranging from 4.5 to 8.0 (average 6.9/10), suggesting significant batch-to-batch differences.